Skip to content

Engineering data · Comparison

304 vs 310S for Oxygen Sensor Housings

By Yu Lianbo — Tooling Design Engineer

Which grade for an oxygen sensor housing?

310S when the housing sits on the exhaust side and has to survive repeated high-temperature cycling without scaling; 304 where the housing is shielded from the hot gas path or runs at moderate temperature. The decision is about oxidation resistance, not about corrosion in a liquid.

304 / 304L310S
Position in the exhaustShielded or moderate-temperature locationsDirectly in the hot gas path, cycled repeatedly
Oxidation / scalingScales when held hot; not an exhaust-side gradeDesigned for high-temperature oxidation resistance
DrawabilityThe easier grade to formWork-hardens hard; more stages or intermediate anneals
Tooling impactReference tooling and lubricationTool material, clearance and lubrication chosen for the grade
CostLowerHigher material cost and slower forming
Typical use hereFitments, shields, dry-side housingsO2, NOx and exhaust temperature sensor housings

Published configurations

GradeConfigurationsHeight range (mm)OD range (mm)
SUS 304470.1-48.59.10-80.00
SUS 3101270.9-54.00.70-16.70

310S is the most used grade in the catalogue (127 of 398 configurations), which reflects how much of the range is exhaust-side sensor work.

What to put on the drawing

  • Maximum continuous temperature and the thermal cycling pattern.
  • Whether the housing is in the gas path or shielded - the same part in a different location changes the grade decision.
  • Wall thickness and sealing-face tolerance, because 310S holds them differently from 304.
  • Any magnetic requirement, which would rule both grades out in favour of a ferritic grade such as 430.
If the answer is not obvious from the drawing alone, send it with the application temperature and the DFM review will say which grade the forming route can hold and what it does to tooling life.

Written by the Balford engineering team, Zhuji, Zhejiang, China. Last updated 21 September 2026.