Ironing tolerances and surface finish: what a thinned wall can hold
Two questions decide whether a part can be ironed instead of turned: how tight the diameters and wall have to be, and how good the surfaces have to look. This page explains where the tolerance in an ironed part actually comes from, and why an ironed surface behaves differently from a turned one.
Where the tolerance comes from
In an ironed part there are three formed characteristics - outside diameter, inside diameter and wall thickness - and they are produced by two tools:
- The ironing ring (die). Its bore is slightly smaller than the incoming cup, so the outside diameter of the finished part is a copy of the die bore, less the elastic recovery of the material.
- The punch. Its outside diameter sets the bore of the part, again less elastic recovery.
- The gap between them. The radial gap between punch and die bore is the finished wall thickness - which is why wall thickness in an ironed part is a tool dimension rather than a process accident.
Three consequences follow. First, the tolerance on the two diameters depends on the accuracy of the tooling rather than on springback alone. Second, the wall thickness tolerances of the incoming blank matter less, because ironing is what sets the wall. Third, concentricity between the bore and the outside diameter is a property of the tool, not of how well the part was gripped.
Where a drawing needs tighter diameters than ironing alone delivers, a short sizing pass - a light second ironing or a calibration pass - is added after the main reduction.
Typical figures for an ironed part
| Characteristic | Typical for an ironed wall | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Wall thickness | Commonly 0.3 mm to 1.5 mm on housings | Set by the punch/die gap, not by the blank tolerance |
| Wall thickness variation | Uniform along the ironed length; variation controlled as a drawing characteristic | This is what the operation exists to achieve |
| Outside and inside diameter | Held on the same part; the drawing sets the limit and a sizing pass is added where it is tighter | Elastic recovery is compensated in the tool |
| Concentricity / runout | Dependent on the tooling axis, not on fixturing | Verified on a concentricity gauge |
| Surface roughness, ironed faces | Ra typically in the region of 0.4-1.6 µm, set by the tooling finish and lubricant | Both the inside and the outside improve |
| Draw marks / striations | Not produced on the ironed length | The wall is squeezed between polished surfaces rather than drawn over a radius |
| Straightness of wall | Straight and parallel | No draft angle needed for demoulding |
These are typical figures, not a specification. The drawing decides: tolerances that are not stated on the drawing follow ISO 2768-m by default, and the characteristics that genuinely matter are flagged during the DFM review so that nothing is discovered at first article.
How an ironed surface differs from a turned one
- No feed marks. Turning leaves a helical tool mark whose pitch is set by the feed rate. Ironing leaves the finish of the die and punch, so there is no feed pattern to see or to measure.
- No striations from the draw. A drawn surface carries the marks of material flowing over the die radius. Ironing happens after that reduction, on a straight wall, between two polished surfaces.
- Both faces improve. On a turned part only the machined face improves; on an ironed part the outside and the inside are both burnished in the same pass.
- Cold work is beneficial - to a point. Ironing raises yield strength and wear resistance. Past a certain reduction the material needs annealing, and on soft-magnetic parts the annealing step is what sets the magnetic properties.
The surfaces are inspected in Balford's own lab on a portable surface roughness tester, alongside the dimensional checks: outside and three-point bore micrometers for the diameters and wall, a concentricity gauge for runout, and a 2.5D optical projector for profile and form.
Frequently asked questions
How tight can the wall thickness be in an ironed part?
Wall thickness is set by the radial gap between the ironing punch and the die bore, so it is a tooling dimension and is more consistent than the incoming blank. The tolerance the drawing can carry is confirmed during the DFM review, and where the diameters need to be tighter than the main ironing pass delivers, a short sizing pass is added.
Does ironing leave draw marks on the surface?
Not on the ironed length. Draw marks come from the material flowing over the die radius during deep drawing; ironing takes place after that, on a straight wall between a polished punch and a polished ring die, so the surface is burnished rather than drawn. Both the inside and the outside improve.
Why is the surface finish better on an ironed part than on a turned part?
Because it is formed by smooth tooling rather than cut by a tool with a feed rate. Turning produces a helical feed mark whose pitch is set by the feed; ironing reproduces the finish of the punch and die, and there is no feed pattern.
Is the wall straighter after ironing?
Yes. Ironing produces a straight, parallel wall without the draft angle that a drawn or cast part needs for demoulding, which is one reason ironed housings are used where an armature or a shaft has to slide in the bore.
Related pages
- Ironing in deep drawing - the core article
- Ironing instead of turning
- Ironing for solenoid valve housings
- Ironing tolerances and surface finish
- Near-net ironing vs forging and casting
- Solenoid valve housings
Discuss Your Project
Send the drawing, we will tell you whether ironing removes a machining step
Send the drawing with material, both diameters and the tolerances that matter. Balford reviews the forming route, the ironing passes and the tooling before quoting.