Skip to content
Deep Drawing · Metal Stamping · CNC Machining · Solenoid Valve Housings · Robotics & UAV Metal Parts · PPAP-ReadyEmail: shawn@balford.net

Deep drawing calculation: a worked example

A 40 mm diameter, 30 mm deep cup in 1.0 mm DC04 — the blank, the draw ratio, the draw force, the press and the die clearance, all the way through, with every assumption written down so you can check it.

What this is for. The point is not the numbers for this one cup. It is to show the order the numbers have to be worked out in, because each one constrains the next: the blank sets the draw ratio, the draw ratio sets the number of draws, the draws set the force, the force sets the press, and the press has to be big enough before the tooling is worth drawing.

1. The part

ParameterValue
Outer diameter d40 mm
Height h30 mm
Wall thickness t1.0 mm
MaterialDC04 deep drawing steel
Tensile strength σB (assumed)300 N/mm²

2. The blank

For a cylindrical cup the blank is sized on surface area, which for a flat bottom and straight wall reduces to:

D ≈ √(d² + 4·d·h)

With d = 40 and h = 30:

D ≈ √(1600 + 4800) = √6400 = 80 mm

So an 80 mm blank. That already tells you something useful: the part needs a blank twice its own diameter, which means a lot of material has to flow inward from the flange, and that is what decides everything after this.

3. The draw ratio, and how many draws

β = D ÷ d = 80 ÷ 40 = 2.0

A draw ratio of 2.0 is right at the edge for DC04, whose first-draw limit is around 1.8–2.0. Rather than gamble on a single operation, the part is planned as two draws:

StageDiameterRatio for that stageWithin limit?
Blank80 mm
First draw55 mm80 ÷ 55 = 1.45yes
Second draw40 mm55 ÷ 40 = 1.38yes

Splitting a 2.0 ratio into 1.45 and 1.38 keeps both stages comfortably inside what the material will take. It also costs a second tooling station — the trade every deep drawing quotation is really about.

4. The draw force

F = π · dp · t · σB · k

with dp the punch diameter of that stage and k an empirical factor that accounts for friction, bending over the die radius and the actual strain distribution. For a first draw of this shape, k around 0.6 is a reasonable starting point. Using the punch of the first stage, 55 mm:

F = 3.1416 · 55 · 1.0 · 300 · 0.6 ≈ 31,100 N ≈ 31 kN

Roughly 3.2 tonnes of draw force. Add the blank holder, which for a first draw typically runs 20–30 % of the draw force:

FNH ≈ 0.25 · 31 kN ≈ 8 kN  →  total ≈ 39 kN

5. The press

39 kN is under 4 tonnes, so on force alone almost any press would do. In practice the press is chosen on three other things:

FactorWhy it decides the press
Bed and strokethe blank is 80 mm and the part 30 mm deep, so the tool needs daylight and a stroke to match
Margina press run near its rating loses parallelism and the wall thickness drifts; shops plan 30–50 % headroom
Stagestwo draws in one tool needs the bed length for two stations, or two separate presses

This is why a part with a small calculated force can still need a disproportionately large press: the number in the formula is the force, not the machine.

6. The die clearance

Clearance per side is set as a multiple of sheet thickness. For DC04 at 1.0 mm, 1.2–1.4 × t is the usual starting range, so about 1.2–1.4 mm per side here. Too tight and the wall is shaved and the tool wears; too loose and the wall wrinkles instead of being ironed straight.

7. The whole plan in one table

QuantityValueSet by
Blank diameter80 mmsurface area of the finished cup
Overall draw ratio2.0blank ÷ finished diameter
Draws2material limit for DC04
Intermediate diameter55 mmsplitting the ratio evenly
Draw force, first stage≈ 31 kNpunch diameter, thickness, tensile strength, factor
Blank holder force≈ 8 kN25 % of draw force
Die clearance per side1.2–1.4 mm1.2–1.4 × thickness

8. Run it with your own numbers

The example above is the arithmetic behind the deep draw force calculator: put in a blank diameter, a punch diameter, a thickness and a tensile strength and it returns the draw force, the draw ratio and a press tonnage. The wider method is in the complete technical guide, including what happens when the ratio will not fit in one draw.

Where this example is deliberately loose. The tensile strength and the factor k are assumptions, and real tooling is signed off on the tryout press, not on the spreadsheet. Treat the numbers as the right order of magnitude and the right sequence — not as a substitute for a DFM review on your own part.

Related